Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in The Blanks (Drag & Drop) ID: #50300 October Prediction Paris
Instructions ›
In the text below some words are missing. Drag words from the box below to the appropriate place in the text. To undo an answer choice, drag the word back to the box below the text.
* Drag the correct answer into all target fields
Paris  is  very  old  —  there  has  been  a  settlement  there  for  at  least  6,000  years  and  its  shape  has  been  determined  in    by  the  River  Seine,  and  in  part  by  the  edicts  of  France'  s  rulers.  But  the  great  boulevards  we  admire  today  are  relatively  new,  and  were  constructed  to  prevent  any  more  barricades  being    by  the  rebellious  population;  that  work  was  carried  out  in  the  middle  19th  century.  The  earlier  Paris  had  been  in  part  a  maze  of  narrow  streets  and  alleyways.  But  you  can  imagine  that  the  work  was  not  only  highly  expensive,  but  caused  great  distress  among  the  half  a  million  or  so  whose  houses  were    razed,  and  whose  neighborhoods  disappeared.  What  is  done  cannot  usually  be  undone,  especially  when  buildings  are  torn  .

up created creating down simply been part random at only

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: part

Explanation: The word 'part' fits grammatically as it serves as a noun indicating a portion of the influence on Paris's shape. The phrase 'in part' is a common expression used to indicate that something is true to some extent, which aligns with the context of how the River Seine and rulers influenced the city's shape.

Meaning: 'Part' refers to a portion or segment of something, indicating that the River Seine and rulers contributed to the city's shape.

Wrong options:

  • only: The word 'only' is an adverb that indicates exclusivity, which does not fit the context of describing how the shape was influenced.
  • at: The preposition 'at' does not grammatically fit in this context, as it does not convey the idea of contribution to the shape.
  • random: The word 'random' is an adjective that implies lack of order or purpose, which does not apply to the structured influence on the city's shape.
  • down: The word 'down' is an adverb that does not fit the context of describing influence and does not relate to the shape of Paris.
  • up: The word 'up' is an adverb that does not convey the intended meaning of contribution to the shape.
  • creating: The gerund 'creating' does not fit grammatically as it does not serve as a noun in this context.
  • been: The word 'been' is a past participle that does not fit as it does not serve as a noun or indicate a portion.
Correct answer: created

Explanation: The verb 'created' fits grammatically as it is in the past participle form, which is appropriate for the passive construction 'being created.' This aligns with the context of barricades being made by the population, indicating an action that was done to them.

Meaning: 'Created' refers to the act of bringing something into existence, in this case, barricades by the population.

Wrong options:

  • only: The adverb 'only' does not fit as it does not relate to the action of making barricades.
  • part: The noun 'part' does not fit grammatically in this context as it does not describe an action.
  • random: The adjective 'random' does not apply to the context of creating barricades, as it implies lack of order.
  • down: The adverb 'down' does not relate to the action of creating barricades and does not fit grammatically.
  • up: The adverb 'up' does not convey the intended meaning of making barricades.
  • simply: The adverb 'simply' does not fit as it does not describe an action and is not in the correct form for this context.
  • been: The past participle 'been' does not fit as it does not describe an action related to barricades.
Correct answer: simply

Explanation: The adverb 'simply' fits grammatically as it modifies the verb 'razed,' indicating the manner in which the houses were destroyed. It conveys that the action was straightforward and without complication, which aligns with the context of the demolition of houses.

Meaning: 'Simply' means in a straightforward or uncomplicated manner, indicating that the razing of houses was done without complexity.

Wrong options:

  • only: The adverb 'only' does not fit as it does not describe the manner of razing and implies exclusivity, which is not relevant here.
  • part: The noun 'part' does not fit grammatically as it does not modify the verb 'razed.'
  • random: The adjective 'random' does not apply to the context of razing houses, as it implies lack of order or purpose.
  • down: The adverb 'down' does not relate to the manner of razing and does not fit grammatically.
  • up: The adverb 'up' does not convey the intended meaning of how the houses were razed.
  • created: The past participle 'created' does not fit as it does not describe the manner of razing houses.
  • been: The past participle 'been' does not fit as it does not modify the verb 'razed'.
Correct answer: down

Explanation: The adverb 'down' fits grammatically as it is commonly used in the phrase 'torn down,' which indicates the action of demolishing buildings. This aligns with the context of buildings being destroyed.

Meaning: 'Down' in this context means to demolish or destroy, particularly in reference to buildings.

Wrong options:

  • only: The adverb 'only' does not fit as it does not describe the action of tearing down buildings.
  • part: The noun 'part' does not fit grammatically as it does not relate to the action of demolition.
  • random: The adjective 'random' does not apply to the context of tearing down buildings, as it implies lack of order or purpose.
  • creating: The gerund 'creating' does not fit as it does not describe the action of tearing down buildings.
  • up: The adverb 'up' does not convey the intended meaning of demolishing and does not fit grammatically.
  • simply: The adverb 'simply' does not relate to the action of tearing down and does not fit in this context.
  • been: The past participle 'been' does not fit as it does not describe the action of tearing down.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 75% Easy · 0% Medium · 25% Hard
Saving...