Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #30170 Medium Chemistry 2
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.
So let me begin by doing a little bit of background so that you know what's going on here. Uh, I was born in Canada. I went to the University of Toronto, and I studied chemical metallurgy. Chemical metallurgy, well you might say, "What's a person who studied chemical metallurgy doing teaching chemistry here?” Well, after my PhD I came here as a postdoctoral fellow in 1977. The plan was to stay for a year or two and go back to Canada. And I lost track of time. So I joined the faculty in 1978 and my first teaching assignment was 309-1 recitation. I had two sections: one met at 8 AM and one met at 9 AM. We don't have 8 AM sections; at least we haven't in recent years. Maybe it's time to revisit that. So my research is electrochemistry, that's why I'm teaching chemistry. Electrochemistry is the most important branch of chemistry. Why not? Find your passion and pursue it. So I'm interested in non-aqueous electrochemistry. I don't care about water. I'm interested in non-aqueous electrochemistry.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "The speaker gives his personal background related to the subject matter of the course. He discusses his background in education as well as research, and his experience teaching at this university."

Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the text. The speaker shares his educational background, including his studies in chemical metallurgy and his research in electrochemistry. He also mentions his teaching experience at the university, making this option a comprehensive reflection of the main ideas presented in the text.

Option 1: "The speaker explains the difference between electrochemistry and chemical metallurgy. The similarities and differences between the two are discussed, as well as factors that determine the differences."

Explanation: This option incorrectly states that the speaker discusses the differences between electrochemistry and chemical metallurgy. The text does not provide a comparison between the two fields; instead, it focuses on the speaker's background and his passion for electrochemistry. Therefore, this option misrepresents the content of the text.

Option 2: "The speaker explains the class objective and procedures to students. He also tells the class his background information and that they have the choice of attending a class either at 8 AM or 9 AM."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because it suggests that the speaker outlines class objectives and procedures, which is not mentioned in the text. While the speaker does provide background information, the focus is on his personal journey and research interests rather than class logistics.

Option 4: "The speaker tells about his experience at the University of Toronto and his PhD studies in electrochemistry there. He explains why he stayed in Canada for a longer period of time than the two years that he had planned."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because it inaccurately states that the speaker discusses his PhD studies in electrochemistry at the University of Toronto. While he mentions his studies and the fact that he stayed longer than planned, the focus of the text is on his overall background and teaching experience, not solely on his time in Canada.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...