Transcript:
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "While we are not about to run out of oil, we are certainly past the peak of oil production, which occurred about 40 years ago. This is despite improvements in technology, geology, and with tax-subsidized investment in exploration."
Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main idea of the text. It acknowledges that while we are not running out of oil, we have passed the peak of production, which aligns with the text's assertion that discovery peaked in 1964 and has been declining despite advancements.
Option 1: "Unless major oil consumers invest in exploration now (which would be the first time major funds have been invested since 1964) global oil production will level out and be unable to meet increased demands from India and China."
Explanation: This option suggests that investment in exploration is necessary to meet future demands, which is not supported by the text. The text emphasizes that discovery has been falling despite investments and advancements, indicating that simply investing now may not change the trend.
Option 2: "With the continuation of improvements in technology, geology, and with government support, there is little doubt that further major reserves of oil will be found in the near future. This should result in sustainable oil supplies for a further 150 years."
Explanation: This option contradicts the text, which states that despite technological and geological advancements, oil discovery has been declining. The text does not support the idea of finding major reserves in the near future, making this option incorrect.
Option 4: "Oil consumption reached its first peak in 1964. Since that time the world has become increasingly dependent on oil. It is unlikely that there will be any new major oil discoveries in the immediate future or at any subsequent time."
Explanation: This option misrepresents the text by stating that oil consumption peaked in 1964, while the text refers to the peak of oil discovery. Additionally, it suggests that no new discoveries are likely, which is not explicitly stated in the text, making this option incorrect.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation