Humans 2 - Marvel EDU

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #30173 Medium Humans 2

Instructions ›

You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.

Transcript:

As you know there has been an unresolved debate as to when and why early humans first started to use fire. However, recent new findings from a study in South Africa have been the talk of the anthropological community. So what are these findings? Well, prehistoric ash and the remains of burnt bones are evidence that early humans used fire much longer ago than previously envisaged. 300,000 years earlier than believed, in fact. Scientists have found evidence of multiple fires, ash and bones deep inside a cave which means it is highly improbable the fires were started naturally. One question that still remains unanswered is why they were using fire. Some researchers are citing the burnt bones as proof that our ancestors cooked the meat, but it has also been suggested they ate the meat raw and then tossed the bones into the fire.

* Click on the correct answer

Anthropologists have disagreed for some time regarding when and how fire was first used in prehistoric times. Recent findings have now managed to finally persuade them that it was used before they thought and the principle use of fire was for cooking rather than any other purpose. Scientists believe they are now nearer to finding an answer to the question of when humans first started to use fire, and it is much earlier than had been thought. Nevertheless, there is still some disagreement among researchers around what early humans actually used the fire for. There has been much discussion by anthropologists about when humans started to use fires. As a result of a recent discovery it is thought that they started to make fires 300,000 years ago, but the reason they made them is still not clear. Recent findings have convinced the anthropological community that previous conclusions from research done over many decades was correct in estimating when early humans started to use fire although this research was incorrect in its findings about what fire was used for.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Option 2: "Scientists believe they are now nearer to finding an answer to the question of when humans first started to use fire, and it is much earlier than had been thought. Nevertheless, there is still some disagreement among researchers around what early humans actually used the fire for."

Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main points of the text. It reflects the new findings indicating that fire was used much earlier than previously thought and acknowledges the ongoing debate regarding the purpose of fire use among early humans. The phrase 'much earlier than had been thought' aligns with the text's mention of 300,000 years earlier, and the mention of disagreement about the use of fire captures the essence of the unresolved questions presented.

Option 1: "Anthropologists have disagreed for some time regarding when and how fire was first used in prehistoric times. Recent findings have now managed to finally persuade them that it was used before they thought and the principle use of fire was for cooking rather than any other purpose."

Explanation: This option incorrectly states that the recent findings have persuaded anthropologists about the primary use of fire being for cooking. The text mentions that some researchers suggest cooking, but it also states that there is disagreement about whether early humans cooked the meat or ate it raw. Therefore, this option presents a misleading conclusion.

Option 3: "There has been much discussion by anthropologists about when humans started to use fires. As a result of a recent discovery it is thought that they started to make fires 300,000 years ago, but the reason they made them is still not clear."

Explanation: While this option correctly notes the discussion about when fire was first used and mentions the 300,000 years earlier finding, it fails to capture the nuance of the ongoing debate regarding the purpose of fire. The text indicates that there are differing opinions on whether fire was used for cooking or other purposes, which this option does not address, making it incomplete.

Option 4: "Recent findings have convinced the anthropological community that previous conclusions from research done over many decades was correct in estimating when early humans started to use fire although this research was incorrect in its findings about what fire was used for."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the findings by suggesting that previous conclusions were correct regarding the timing of fire use. The text states that the new findings indicate fire was used much earlier than previously believed, which contradicts the assertion that earlier conclusions were correct. Additionally, it does not accurately reflect the ongoing debate about the purpose of fire, making it misleading.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.

Saving...