Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #34843 Medium Research
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.

Transcript:

How long does it take from starting something and being grossly incompetent and knowing it to being reasonably good? In hopefully, as short a period of time as possible. So, how long does that take? Here's what my research says: 20 hours. That's it. You can go from knowing nothing about any skill that you can think of. Want to learn a language? Want to learn how to draw? Want to learn how to juggle flaming chainsaws? If you put 20 hours of focused deliberate practice into that thing, you will be astounded. Astounded at how good you are. 20 hours is doable, that's about 45 minutes a day for about a month. Even skipping a couple days, here and there. 20 hours isn’t that hard to accumulate. Now, there’s a method to doing this. Because it's not like you can just start fiddling around for about 20 hours and expect these massive improvements. There's a way to practice intelligently. There's a way to practice efficiently, that will make sure that you invest those 20 hours in the most effective way that you possibly can.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "Research has shown that it takes you just 20 hours to be reasonably good in a thing, provided that you have invested these 20 hours in an intelligent and effective way."

Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main idea of the text. It states that 20 hours of focused practice can lead to being reasonably good at a skill, which aligns with the text's assertion. The phrase 'intelligent and effective way' reflects the text's emphasis on the method of practice, making this option a comprehensive and correct summary.

Option 1: "Research has shown that when you start fiddling around for about 20 hours, you will lose your opportunity to be an expert in language in the future, because these 20 hours in the beginning are the most important."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the text by suggesting that 20 hours of practice will lead to losing the opportunity to become an expert. The text emphasizes that 20 hours can lead to being reasonably good, not that it prevents future expertise. Additionally, the phrase 'fiddling around' implies a lack of focused practice, which contradicts the text's emphasis on 'focused deliberate practice.'

Option 2: "Research has shown that a person can become a master in drawing or chainsaws within only 20 hours, but you need to practise your skills intelligently."

Explanation: This option incorrectly states that one can become a 'master' in 20 hours, while the text only claims that one can become 'reasonably good.' The term 'master' implies a much higher level of proficiency than what is discussed in the text. Furthermore, while the text does mention the need for intelligent practice, it does not suggest that mastery is achievable in such a short time.

Option 3: "Research has shown that it’s not hard to accumulate 20 hours to improve your skills, but this has to happen within a month, because skipping a couple days will make your efforts useless."

Explanation: This option inaccurately states that skipping days will make efforts 'useless.' The text acknowledges that skipping a few days is acceptable and does not imply that it negates the benefits of practice. The focus of the text is on the accumulation of 20 hours of practice, not on strict adherence to a daily schedule.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...