Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #38266 Medium Rwanda
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.

Transcript:

In fact, Rwanda is one of the two only countries in the world that has absolute parity in the parliaments where women parliamentarians are actually more numerous than their male counterparts, the other countries Bolivia, at least from 2019, statistics. And what we've seen in Rwanda is that there's a pretty good track record on investment towards education in the country compared to other neighbouring African countries. So again, I haven't done a full PhD on correlation between women's parliamentarian and education outcomes. But it does make a huge difference. But also because it sets a precedent it shows it brings a nice model for the youth, for girls and adolescent girls who are now entering into new sectors and new education disciplines to see that they actually can go all the way to leadership positions. Because if we don't have quota, then none of the other moral arguments have worked. So far, women still face backlash at every level of decision making, and in all domains of their life.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "The speaker highlights Rwanda and Bolivia as examples of countries with gender parity in their parliaments, suggesting that this leads to better education outcomes and sets a positive precedent for girls and adolescent girls to pursue leadership positions."

Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main ideas presented in the text. It identifies Rwanda and Bolivia as examples of gender parity in parliaments and connects this representation to positive educational outcomes and the encouragement of girls to pursue leadership roles, aligning well with the speaker's message.

Option 1: "The speaker focuses on the importance of quotas for women in leadership positions, arguing that they lead to better education outcomes and provide a positive model for future generations."

Explanation: This option incorrectly emphasizes the importance of quotas as the main focus of the speaker. While quotas are mentioned, the text does not argue that they lead directly to better education outcomes. Instead, it discusses the broader impact of women's representation in parliament on societal models for girls.

Option 2: "The speaker is a detailed analysis of the correlation between women parliamentarians and education outcomes in Rwanda and Bolivia, concluding that quotas are the most effective method for promoting gender equality."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the speaker's intent. The speaker does not provide a detailed analysis or conclude that quotas are the most effective method. Instead, they mention the lack of a full analysis and focus on the impact of representation rather than a direct correlation.

Option 3: "The speaker argues that moral arguments alone are insufficient for promoting gender equality in leadership positions, and that only quotas have proven to be effective in achieving parity in parliaments."

Explanation: While this option captures part of the speaker's message about the insufficiency of moral arguments, it incorrectly states that only quotas have proven effective. The text suggests that quotas are necessary but does not claim they are the sole method for achieving gender equality.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...