Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #39490 Long Google
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.
To protect your privacy. So now there has become this split, this very real wedge driven between government agencies on the one hand, and Silicon Valley companies on the other because these companies now are providing some meaningful degree of privacy which is one of the great changes of this node in reporting there providing end-to-end encryption. They're telling governments they can't turn over information even if the governments get warrants because they are no longer able to access them, you now see governments publicly accusing Facebook and Google of being aiders and abettors of ISIS or partners with Al Qaeda. And I think this war is great! I want a fuel that fires as much as possible because I think it's incredibly dangerous when you have what essentially is a merger of massive amounts of public and private power, and there's very seamless way so that public officials go to work for these private companies when they leave public life, these private officials and private executives become government officials and then go back again and it becomes this one very harmonious cooperative enterprise. And that's particularly dangerous because we now have these giants like Facebook and Google, in particular, and Apple, that have compiled more wealth and more power and more data about all of us than any companies in human history. I mean, they're unquestionably more powerful than essentially every government on earth; and they conduct themselves completely in secret. So, the Internet of Things or the development of artificial intelligence with massive implications for what our world is going to be and how it's going to function, are done entirely opaquely, completely without transparency.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "The speaker discusses the rivalry between government agencies and technology companies over privacy, the dangers of the merger of public and private power, and the lack of transparency in the operations of powerful technology companies."

Explanation: This option accurately captures the main ideas of the text. The speaker discusses the conflict between government and technology companies regarding privacy, warns about the risks of merging public and private power, and highlights the lack of transparency in how these companies operate, which aligns with the overall theme of the text.

Option 1: "The speaker describes the positive impact of end-to-end encryption in preserving user privacy and how it strengthens the bond between technology companies and government agencies."

Explanation: This option incorrectly suggests that the speaker views the relationship between technology companies and government agencies as positive. The text actually emphasizes a split and rivalry between these entities, particularly highlighting the dangers of their merger rather than any strengthening of bonds.

Option 2: "The speaker highlights the technological advancements that have led to an increase in privacy and argues that this has improved the relationships between technology giants and the general public."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the speaker's focus. While the text mentions advancements like end-to-end encryption, it does not claim these have improved relationships with the public. Instead, it discusses the dangers of the power held by technology companies and their lack of transparency.

Option 4: "The speaker explains the benefits of the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence in ensuring the protection of user privacy, while also highlighting the importance of transparency in the development of these technologies."

Explanation: This option incorrectly frames the discussion as one of benefits. The speaker does not present the Internet of Things or artificial intelligence as beneficial for privacy; rather, the text emphasizes the dangers and lack of transparency associated with these technologies.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...