Transcript:
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "There are several levels of empathy - like basic empathy, sympathy and compassion. Human empathy is not what it should be, as we do not attribute human thoughts and emotions to animal behavior. Despite them having almost similar brains."
Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the text by outlining the different levels of empathy: basic empathy, sympathy, and compassion. It also reflects the author's critique of human empathy, noting that humans often fail to attribute emotions to animals, despite the similarities in brain structure. This encapsulates the main ideas presented in the text.
Option 1: "Studying animal behavior is the best way to know about human thoughts and emotions. As when compared to other species, we can understand what makes humans the most successful predator among all species."
Explanation: This option incorrectly emphasizes studying animal behavior as the primary means to understand human thoughts and emotions. The text does mention human predation, but it does not support the idea that this study is the best way to understand human success as predators. Instead, the text focuses on the levels of empathy and the relationship between human and animal emotions.
Option 2: "Attributing human thoughts and emotions to other species is the best first guess we can have to know about what the animals are doing and how they're feeling, because their brains are basically the same as ours."
Explanation: While this option captures part of the text's message about attributing human emotions to animals, it misses the broader context of empathy levels discussed in the text. The main idea revolves around the different levels of empathy and how human empathy is flawed, rather than solely focusing on animal behavior.
Option 4: "Humans are an odd species, they have empathy, which like everything else in life, comes on a sliding scale and has its elaboration. This is what makes one sad knowing when somebody else's grandmother passes away."
Explanation: This option presents a narrow view of empathy by focusing on the sadness associated with another's loss. While it mentions the sliding scale of empathy, it does not encompass the full range of empathy levels discussed in the text, nor does it address the critique of human empathy's shortcomings.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation