Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #4269 Medium Nike
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.
To turn now to other industries, Nike was also one of the first US companies to send production to other countries. In the 1980s, the company initially sent the manufacturing of its sports shoes to its subcontractors in Japan and China. This process has become known as ‘offshore’ outsourcing. It’s argued that this approach allows Nike to focus more on what it does best: brand building, marketing and design, and it leaves the manufacturing to offshore third parties. One consequence of outsourcing Nike did not anticipate was the bad publicity it received in the 1990s, following reports of poor working conditions in its outsourced Indonesian factories. The company’s response has been to monitor its subcontractors closely in different countries to avoid any future scandals. Dell Computers and Apple are just two manufacturers of consumer electronic goods that get suppliers in countries such as Taiwan and China to make their products. Today most US manufacturers outsource some or all of their products. In fact, companies that are in the manufacturing and distribution sectors all over the world are moving towards the Nike model. Outsourcing may have its critics and its disadvantages but there is no doubt that it is here to stay.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "Offshore outsourcing means sending production to other countries, and it is very popular among US companies. But bad publicity has forced them to monitor their subcontractors closely. Now even global manufacturers and distributors have started following the Nike model."

Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main ideas of the text. It defines offshore outsourcing and highlights its popularity among US companies, including Nike. It also mentions the bad publicity that led to increased monitoring of subcontractors, which is a significant consequence discussed in the text. Furthermore, it notes that other global manufacturers are adopting the Nike model, aligning well with the text's conclusion.

Option 1: "Nike was one of the first US companies to send production to other countries, which was later joined by manufacturers of consumer electronic goods like Dell Computers and Apple. However, these tactics have been mired with scandals."

Explanation: This option incorrectly emphasizes that Nike's tactics have been solely mired in scandals, which does not capture the overall theme of the text. While it mentions Nike's pioneering role in outsourcing, it fails to address the broader context of offshore outsourcing's popularity among US companies and the subsequent monitoring of subcontractors, which is a key point in the text.

Option 3: "Nike started a great trend among US companies to send production to other countries. This has been really beneficial for them and their subcontractors in Japan and China. This approach also allows Nike to focus more on brand building, marketing and design."

Explanation: This option presents a one-sided view that emphasizes the benefits of outsourcing without acknowledging the negative consequences, such as the bad publicity Nike faced. It also inaccurately suggests that the trend has been universally beneficial, which contradicts the text's mention of scandals and the need for monitoring subcontractors.

Option 4: "To boost outsourcing and scaling up production, response has been created by US companies like Nike to monitor which will monitor their subcontractors closely in different countries to avoid any future scandals."

Explanation: This option is grammatically awkward and unclear, particularly with the phrase 'response has been created.' It fails to capture the essence of the text, which discusses the proactive monitoring of subcontractors as a reaction to past scandals rather than as a means to boost outsourcing. Additionally, it does not mention the broader trend of outsourcing among US companies.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...