Perversities - Marvel EDU

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #44045 Medium Perversities

Instructions ›

You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.

Transcript:

By one of the ironic perversities that often attend the course of affairs, the existence of the works of art upon which formation of aesthetic theory depends has become an obstruction to theory about them. For one reason: these works are products that exist externally and physically. In common conception, the work of art is often identified with the building, book, painting, or statue in its existence apart from human experience. Since the actual work of art is what the product does with and in experience, the result is not favourable to understanding. In addition, the very perfection of some of these products, the prestige they possess because of a long history of unquestioned admiration, creates conventions that get in the way of fresh insight. When an art product once attains classic status, it somehow becomes isolated from the human conditions under which it was brought into being and from the human consequences it engenders in actual life experience.

* Click on the correct answer

The existence of art obstructs the development of aesthetic theories due to its physical nature and societal perceptions. Works of art are not important in the development of aesthetic theory. Classic works of art maintain a strong connection to their historical and human origins. Art theory is greatly enhanced by the physical and perfect nature of art works.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Option 1: "The existence of art obstructs the development of aesthetic theories due to its physical nature and societal perceptions."

Explanation: This option accurately captures the main idea of the text, which discusses how the physical existence of art and societal perceptions create obstacles to the development of aesthetic theories. The text emphasizes that the works of art, being external and physically present, hinder understanding and fresh insights into aesthetic theory.

Option 2: "Works of art are not important in the development of aesthetic theory."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the text. While it suggests that works of art are unimportant, the text actually argues that their existence complicates the development of aesthetic theory, indicating that they are indeed significant but problematic.

Option 3: "Classic works of art maintain a strong connection to their historical and human origins."

Explanation: This option contradicts the text, which states that classic works of art become isolated from the human conditions and consequences that brought them into being. Therefore, it inaccurately reflects the relationship between classic art and its origins.

Option 4: "Art theory is greatly enhanced by the physical and perfect nature of art works."

Explanation: This option is incorrect as it suggests a positive relationship between art theory and the physical nature of art works. The text argues that the perfection and physicality of art actually obstruct understanding and fresh insights, making this statement misleading.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.

Saving...