Transcript:
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "An article has outlined the possible consequences of a growing trend in milk substitutes. It recommends government action to prevent health issues that might arise if consumers omit dairy milk from their diets."
Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main idea of the text, which discusses the health risks associated with the increasing trend of milk substitutes and the recommendation for government action to address these issues. It captures the essence of the article's warning about iodine deficiency and the need for awareness.
Option 1: "The government is warning that, unless consumers pay more attention to the amount of milk they drink in their diet, there is the possibility that their health could be impaired, leading to a lower IQ than those who have a sufficient milk intake."
Explanation: This option misrepresents the text by implying that the government is issuing a warning, whereas the warning comes from a science journal. Additionally, it suggests a direct comparison of IQ levels based solely on milk intake, which is not explicitly stated in the text.
Option 2: "Despite repeated warnings by a science publication, many people are ignorant of the harm being done to their children by fake milk. The magazine holds the government to account for failing to provide alternative iodine sources to dairy milk in order to address this problem."
Explanation: This option inaccurately describes the text by using the term 'fake milk,' which is not mentioned. It also suggests that the magazine blames the government for not providing alternatives, while the text focuses on raising awareness rather than assigning blame.
Option 3: "In a publication aimed at scientists, an article warns that the omission of vital nutritional information on food packaging is resulting in harmful deficiencies of minerals in the diets of many. It suggests that better labelling could result in better brain development and higher IQs for children."
Explanation: This option incorrectly states that the publication is aimed at scientists, while the text refers to a popular science journal. It also misrepresents the focus on labeling, as the text emphasizes the health risks of iodine deficiency rather than solely advocating for better labeling.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation