Transcript:
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "There are several great things about USA Today. The greatest one being that it revolutionized the way news was written and distributed. It promoted new methods of writing reports and changed public's perception about newspapers."
Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the text by highlighting USA Today’s revolutionary role in changing how news was written and distributed. It captures the essence of the text, which discusses how USA Today transformed the newspaper industry and public perception, aligning well with the main idea presented.
Option 1: "USA Today is a revolutionary paper that changed the way news was report. While it is no longer in service, the paper promoted shorter stories and more accurate information."
Explanation: This option incorrectly states that USA Today is no longer in service, which contradicts the text that indicates it has thrived for over 25 years. Additionally, while it mentions the promotion of shorter stories, it fails to capture the broader impact of USA Today on the newspaper industry as described in the text.
Option 2: "The newspapers before USA Today were old fashion They were in trouble because not many people were reading those papers. They were also filled with horror stories about crimes and killing."
Explanation: This option focuses too narrowly on the problems of newspapers before USA Today, which is only part of the text. It does not summarize the main idea of USA Today’s revolutionary impact on the industry, nor does it mention the changes in writing and news delivery that the text emphasizes.
Option 4: "Long stories and lack of colored photos were the main reasons that USA Today's competitors failed in the news market. However, by observing the style of USA Today, these newspapers slowly caught up to the latest news trends."
Explanation: This option misrepresents the text by suggesting that long stories and lack of colored photos were the primary reasons for competitors' failures. The text does mention these aspects, but it does not imply they were the main reasons. Instead, it emphasizes the overall transformation brought by USA Today, which this option fails to encapsulate.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation