Transcript:
We can swing our arms, hold our bodies up straight and keep our head still. We have long legs and feet that store energy, which make it easier to take another step. Whereas other animals have to use a lot more energy to do this. Our ability to sweat might not seem like an advantage, but it allows us to lose heat when we're running in high temperatures. We can also breath through our noses and mouth when we run, which is important because other animals can’t. I think it's likely that ancient humans caught animals by tracking them during the hottest part of the day. They chase the animals again and again over long distances without stopping until the animal finally became overheated and collapsed.
According to the speaker, what gave ancient humans an advantage over faster animals?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "They could run further."
Explanation: The text states that ancient humans were built to run long distances, which is a key advantage over faster animals that are not built for endurance. This aligns with the main idea that humans' ability to run further gives them an edge in hunting.
Option 2: "They were more intelligent."
Explanation: While intelligence may play a role in survival, the text does not mention intelligence as a factor that gave ancient humans an advantage over faster animals. Therefore, this option is not supported by the text.
Option 3: "They kept lower body temperatures."
Explanation: The text highlights the ability of humans to sweat, which helps them maintain lower body temperatures while running. This physiological advantage allows them to run longer distances without overheating, thus providing an edge over faster animals.
Option 4: "They did not give up easily."
Explanation: The text implies that ancient humans showed determination by chasing animals over long distances until the animals became overheated. This persistence is a significant advantage in hunting, supporting the idea that they did not give up easily.
Option 5: "They had longer arms and legs."
Explanation: The text mentions long legs but does not state anything about longer arms. Additionally, the advantage discussed is related to running long distances, not the length of arms. Thus, this option is incorrect.
Option 6: "They thought running was satisfying."
Explanation: The text does not mention any emotional or psychological aspects of running, such as satisfaction. It focuses on physical advantages, making this option unsupported by the text.
Option 7: "They had weapons to help them."
Explanation: The text explicitly states that ancient humans were mostly weapon-less, which contradicts this option. Therefore, it is not a valid answer.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation