Transcript:
The Inuit experience of snow doesn't actually help us understand these issues that much. Lots of languages have more than one word for something. Take English for example, whether you eat food or consume it, your experience is the same. And all languages develop a richer, more specific vocabulary as and when needed. The medical profession is a good example of this or the computer industry. So, do the words you hear influence the way you think? Well the answer is still.. maybe. There’s certainly a possibility that if we allowed a language... a minority language like Inuit to die. We’d lose the secrets it held forever.
When talking about the Inuit language, the speaker is
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "interested in how the number of words for snow has attracted attention."
Explanation: The text discusses how the number of Inuit words for snow has become a topic of interest, starting with Franz Boas' claim and the subsequent increase in the number cited by various sources. This aligns with the speaker's interest in the phenomenon surrounding the number of words, making this option correct.
Option 2: "surprised that the different kinds of snow make so many words necessary."
Explanation: The text does not express surprise regarding the necessity of different words for snow; rather, it highlights the debate around the number of words without implying that the speaker is surprised. Therefore, this option misrepresents the speaker's attitude.
Option 3: "annoyed that foreigners find it hard to learn the difficult vocabulary."
Explanation: There is no indication in the text that the speaker is annoyed about foreigners struggling with the vocabulary. The focus is on the broader implications of language and thought rather than personal feelings about language learning, making this option incorrect.
Option 4: "aware that several words may describe the same physical thing."
Explanation: The speaker acknowledges that many languages, including English, have multiple words for the same concept, as illustrated by the example of 'eat' versus 'consume.' This awareness of linguistic variation supports this option as correct.
Option 5: "confident that people who speak it understand life in a different way."
Explanation: The text suggests a possibility that understanding the Inuit language could lead to new experiences, but it does not assert confidence in a different understanding of life by its speakers. This makes the option incorrect as it overstates the speaker's position.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation