Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #36397 Long Discrimination
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
Let's talk about the pros and cons of discrimination in the USA. I'm sure you are thinking to yourself why I have included pros and cons in my opening statement. Aren't there only bad things that result in discrimination? Well, the answer in most cases is yes. When we discriminate, a negative outcome usually results. However, let's say you are an employer of a business. And the government has told you that you must hire a certain number of women, or a certain percentage of black and white people. This would restrain you from hiring, promoting, and firing your employees. Ok, let's take a step back and discuss why in some cases, individual freedom to choose or discriminate who will work for you can be a good thing. During the past forty years, the American government has put rules in place to increase the protection of the environment and groups such as minorities, women workers, and consumers. These new rules have resulted in numerous regulations and new bodies of law, which in some cases have resulted in extreme policies, like the one I described before about an employer not being able to select an employee of his or her choice based on sex or color. As a result, opponents argue that individualism has been lost with these new laws. On the other side of the coin, some anti-discrimination proponents argued against the traditional division of occupational roles between men and women. These arguments led to major legal cases, which in turn led to strong requirements to recruit women for jobs usually held by men such as skilled manual and mechanical work on construction sites.

According to the lecture: what are the main changes since the 1970s?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Most jobs became open to ethnic groups."

Explanation: The text discusses how the American government implemented rules to protect minorities, which implies that job opportunities for ethnic groups have expanded since the 1970s. This aligns with the main idea of increased inclusivity in the workforce.

Option 2: "The word used to refer to the fireman was changed."

Explanation: The text mentions changes in language and roles, indicating a shift towards more inclusive terminology. This reflects societal changes since the 1970s, supporting the idea that language has evolved to be more gender-neutral.

Option 3: "Women began to be trained together with men in the military."

Explanation: While the text does not explicitly mention military training, it discusses the breaking down of traditional gender roles, which includes women entering fields previously dominated by men. This suggests that women have gained more opportunities, including in military training.

Option 4: "Individualism has been reflected in the hiring process."

Explanation: The text argues that individualism has been lost due to regulations that restrict employers' choices in hiring. This contradicts the statement, as it suggests that individualism is not reflected in the current hiring process.

Option 5: "Women were allowed to fight in the battlefield like men did."

Explanation: The text does not mention women fighting in the battlefield. While it discusses changes in roles, it does not provide evidence that women have been allowed to engage in combat, making this statement unsupported.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...