Transcript:
I think it's often completely mixed up. And I think that's understandable because if you think about the people who are communicating, let's take climate scientists just because I am one. We have been studying, you know, the changing climate, we've seen the changes. I'm a polar scientist, I've seen the changes and the scale of the changes, and it's horrifying and so it's very difficult not to get personally involved and and to want certain outcomes from your communication. Trying to dissociate and step back from that and be reallly, genuinely as one can be and be as dispassionate as possible is challenging.
According to the audio, what are two important aspects to consider in climate science communication?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "Being clear about the goals of the communication."
Explanation: This option is correct as the text explicitly states the importance of being clear about the goals of climate science communication. The author mentions that the goals are often mixed up, highlighting the need for clarity in communication.
Option 1: "Encouraging people to take immediate action to reduce emissions."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not emphasize the need for immediate action to reduce emissions. Instead, it discusses the importance of informing people to make their own decisions, which does not necessarily imply immediate action.
Option 3: "Ensuring the inclusion of emotional appeals to inspire change."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not advocate for emotional appeals. Instead, it discusses the challenge of remaining dispassionate and unbiased, suggesting that emotional appeals may not be the focus of effective communication.
Option 4: "The challenge of remaining dispassionate and unbiased as a scientist."
Explanation: This option is correct as the text addresses the difficulty scientists face in remaining dispassionate when communicating about climate change. The author acknowledges the personal involvement and emotional challenges that can affect communication.
Option 5: "Prioritizing the use of striking visual aids in communication."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not mention the use of visual aids as a priority in climate science communication. The focus is on clarity of goals and the challenge of emotional involvement, rather than specific communication tools.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation