Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #3991 Medium Planet
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
Plants rule the planet - at least in terms of sheer mass. Many tallies of Earth's life use biodiversity as a measurement and simply count the number of species. A new census, based on biomass, compiled data from hundreds of studies to determine which kingdoms, classes and species carry the most global heft. The results show that plants (primarily those on land) account for 80 percent of the total biomass, with bacteria across all ecosystems a distant second at 15 percent. The findings were published online in May in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Higher-resolution satellite data and improvements in genomic sequencing have made such measurements possible by yielding more accurate estimates, but the uncertainty is still high for hard-to-count life-forms such as microbes and insects. Antarctic krill, a type of small crustacean, have a total biomass comparable to that of humans. We make up only one 100th of a percent of the total, but we still dwarf that of all wild mammals. Livestock also dominate: chickens, for example, account for three times the biomass of wild birds. The study estimates that humans have decreased the biomass of wild mammals sixfold and plants twofold through actions such as hunting and deforestation.

How does the speaker say humans have impacted the biomass of certain kingdoms, classes or species?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Decreased the biomass of wild mammals by hunting"

Explanation: The text states that humans have decreased the biomass of wild mammals sixfold through actions such as hunting. This directly supports the option, as it accurately reflects the information presented in the text.

Option 2: "Decreased the biomass of plants by hunting"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not mention hunting as a factor in decreasing the biomass of plants. Instead, it states that humans have decreased the biomass of plants twofold through deforestation, not hunting.

Option 3: "Decreased the biomass of bacteria using soap"

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not discuss any impact on bacteria due to soap or any other means. It only mentions that bacteria account for 15 percent of the total biomass without indicating any decrease caused by humans.

Option 4: "Decreased the biomass of wild mammals by deforestation"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text specifies that the decrease in wild mammals' biomass is attributed to hunting, not deforestation. Therefore, it misrepresents the cause of the decrease.

Option 5: "Decreased the biomass of plants by deforestation"

Explanation: The text states that humans have decreased the biomass of plants twofold through actions such as deforestation. This option is correct as it accurately reflects the information provided in the text.

Option 6: "Decreased the biomass of chickens by consuming them"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not mention any decrease in the biomass of chickens due to human consumption. Instead, it highlights that chickens account for three times the biomass of wild birds, indicating that their biomass is not decreased.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...