Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #4069 Medium Curing disease
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
Take a moment and think about a virus. What comes to your mind? An illness? A fear? Probably something really unpleasant. And yet, viruses are not all the same. It's true, some of them cause devastating disease. But others can do the exact opposite - they can cure disease. These viruses are called "phages". Now, the first time I heard about phages was back in 2013. My father-in-law, who's a surgeon, was telling me about a woman he was treating. The woman had a knee injury, required multiple surgeries, and over the course of these, developed a chronic bacterial infection in her leg. Unfortunately for her, the bacteria causing the infection also did not respond to any antibiotic that was available. So at this point, typically, the only option left is to amputate the leg to stop the infection from spreading further. Now, my father-in-law was desperate for different kind of solution, and he applied for an experimental, last-resort treatment using phages. And guess what? It worked. Within three weeks of applying the phages, the chronic infection had healed up, where before, no antibiotic was working. I was fascinated by this weird conception: viruses curing an infection. To this day, I am fascinated by the medical potential of phages. And I actually quit my job last year to build a company in this space.

What does the speaker say that the weird conception of phages is touted to deliver?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "Relief from chronic infection"

Explanation: This option is correct as the text explicitly states that the application of phages resulted in the healing of the chronic infection that the woman had. The speaker mentions that within three weeks, the infection healed, which directly relates to providing relief from the chronic condition.

Option 1: "Multiple surgeries simultaneously"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not mention multiple surgeries being a result of phages or their treatment. Instead, it discusses the surgeries the woman underwent before considering phage treatment. The focus is on the phages curing the infection, not on the surgeries.

Option 2: "Injections for killing virus"

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not refer to phages being used as injections to kill viruses. Instead, it highlights phages as a treatment for bacterial infections, not viral ones. The speaker emphasizes the healing of a chronic bacterial infection, not the killing of a virus.

Option 3: "Bacteria that is really powerful"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not describe phages as delivering powerful bacteria. Rather, it discusses how phages can cure infections caused by bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. The focus is on the treatment of infections, not on the characteristics of bacteria.

Option 5: "Some kind of alternative to antibiotics"

Explanation: This option is correct because the text implies that phages serve as an alternative treatment when antibiotics fail. The speaker discusses the desperation for a different solution when antibiotics did not work, highlighting the potential of phages as a viable alternative.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...