Transcript:
Well, as you all know, traditionally writing done by a student is checked, marked and graded by a teacher, a tutor or in some situations an examiner, in other words, a real person. Software to mark essays has been in development for some time and grading software on computers is already used by some universities to mark exams but it is still viewed with suspicion by some. How can a computer mark an essay they ask? Well, a recent study compared the human ability to give grades to student essays to the ability of a computer to do the same job. In the study, over 16,000 essays were used. These essays had already been previously marked by at least one trained human grader.
The study showed that the essay marks given by the computer software were almost the same as those from human graders - which I think you'll agree is a controversial result and ifs likely to make us as teachers re-evaluate how we grade written work.
The purposes of this talk are to
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "Present different methods for grading writing"
Explanation: This option is correct because the speaker discusses both traditional human grading methods and the emerging use of computer software for grading essays. This clearly indicates a presentation of different methods for grading writing, aligning with the main idea of the talk.
Option 1: "Explain how humans grade writing"
Explanation: While the text mentions how traditionally writing is graded by humans, the primary focus of the talk is not solely on explaining this process. Instead, it discusses the comparison between human grading and computer grading, making this option too narrow and not aligned with the overall purpose of the talk.
Option 3: "Criticize the use of technology in grading writing"
Explanation: The text does not criticize the use of technology; rather, it presents a study that shows the effectiveness of computer grading compared to human grading. The speaker acknowledges the suspicion surrounding technology but does not take a critical stance, making this option incorrect.
Option 4: "Describe the findings of a research project"
Explanation: This option is correct as the speaker describes a study that compared human and computer grading of essays, highlighting the findings that the marks were almost the same. This aligns with the purpose of the talk, which includes discussing research findings.
Option 5: "Suggest directions for future research"
Explanation: The text does not suggest future research directions; it focuses on presenting current findings regarding grading methods. Therefore, this option is not supported by the content of the talk.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation