Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #33172 Birds Killed
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
Large wind farms might interfere with the flight patterns of migratory birds in certain areas, and they have killed large birds of prey (especially hawks, falcons, and eagles) that prefer to hunt along the same ridge lines that are ideal for wind turbines. The killing of birds of prey by wind turbines has pitted environmentalists who champion wildlife protection against environmentalists who promote renewable wind energy. Researchers are evaluating how serious this problem is and hope to find ways to eliminate or sharply reduce this problem. Some analysts also contend that the number of birds killed by wind turbines is dwarfed by birds killed by other human-related sources and by the potential loss of entire bird species from possible global warming. Recorded deaths of birds of prey and other birds in wind farms in the United States currently amount to no more than 300 per year. By contrast, in the United States an estimated 97 million birds are killed each year when they collide with buildings made of plate glass, 57 million are killed on highways each year; at least 3.8 million die annually from pollution and poisoning; and millions of birds are electrocuted each year by transmission and distribution lines carrying power produced by nuclear and coal power plants.

In the paragraph, why does the author give details about the estimated numbers of birds killed each year?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "To demonstrate the number of birds killed by wind turbines is overestimated"

Explanation: This option is correct because the text provides comparative statistics showing that the number of birds killed by wind turbines (300 per year) is significantly lower than the number killed by other human-related sources. This suggests that the impact of wind turbines on bird deaths may be overestimated.

Option 1: "To argue that wind farms should not be built along ridge lines"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not explicitly argue against building wind farms along ridge lines. Instead, it presents information about bird deaths without making a direct argument for or against the placement of wind farms.

Option 2: "To point out that the deaths of migratory birds exceed the deaths of birds of prey"

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not state that the deaths of migratory birds exceed those of birds of prey. It focuses on the number of birds killed by wind turbines compared to other human-related causes, rather than making a direct comparison between migratory birds and birds of prey.

Option 3: "To explain why some environmentalists oppose wind energy"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not provide a detailed explanation of why some environmentalists oppose wind energy. It mentions a conflict between two groups of environmentalists but does not delve into the reasons for opposition.

Option 5: "To suggest that wind turbines result in relatively few bird deaths"

Explanation: This option is correct as the text highlights that the number of birds killed by wind turbines is relatively small compared to the millions killed by other causes, such as collisions with buildings and highways. This context supports the idea that wind turbines result in relatively few bird deaths.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...