Which of the following statements can be supported by the text?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "The universe is a relatively simple phenomenon."
Explanation: The text states that the universe is 'far less complicated than the Earth' and emphasizes its simplicity, especially when compared to terrestrial affairs. This aligns with the main idea that the universe, despite its vastness, is simpler than smaller, more intricate systems.
Option 2: "Billions of galaxies are predicted to explode, adding to the universal complexity."
Explanation: The text does not mention any predictions of galaxies exploding or suggest that this would add complexity. Instead, it describes the universe as a simpler phenomenon, contradicting the idea of increasing complexity.
Option 3: "Galaxy clusters are an illusion."
Explanation: The text describes galaxy clusters as being 'loosely bound by the gravity of their largest members,' indicating their existence and physical properties. Therefore, stating they are an illusion is incorrect.
Option 4: "Clusters of galaxies are held together by gravity."
Explanation: The text explicitly states that 'these clusters are loosely bound by the gravity of their largest members,' directly supporting this option as a correct statement.
Option 5: "Galaxies simply shine brightly."
Explanation: While galaxies do shine, the text does not focus on this aspect. Instead, it discusses the complexity and simplicity of the universe, making this statement too narrow and not supported by the text.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation