Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #34771 National Transportation
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
After the investigation of the causes of the accident, the National Transportation Safety Board concluded that the reason consisted in the improper controlling of the engines' serviceability. Although, the plane underwent a regular checking by professional mechanists, engineers did not notice any damages during the engine changes in Tulsa, Therefore, we can say that the ignoring of the standard regulating procedure, regulated by the aviation law standards, caused the plane crash. The reason of the ignoring of the air law regulations consisted in the inability to identify and prevent the usage of improper maintenance procedures, Thus, a lack of attention of engineers and a complicated construction of the plane prevented the normal controlling and resulted in the neglecting of the aviation laws and rules.

Which of the following are true statements?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "Additional reason for the accident may be the ignoring of standard regulations."

Explanation: The text explicitly mentions that the ignoring of standard regulating procedures caused the plane crash, indicating that this was indeed an additional reason for the accident.

Option 1: "The complicated construction of the plane led to the accident."

Explanation: The text states that the complicated construction of the plane prevented normal controlling, but it does not directly attribute the accident to this factor alone. Therefore, this option misrepresents the cause of the accident.

Option 3: "The engineers did not notice the damage because they were careless."

Explanation: The text does not state that the engineers were careless; it mentions that they did not notice any damages during the engine changes, which does not imply carelessness. Thus, this option is misleading.

Option 4: "Engines are easily controllable."

Explanation: The text implies that the complicated construction of the plane made controlling the engines difficult, contradicting the statement that engines are easily controllable.

Option 5: "The core reason for the accident was the improper controlling of the engines."

Explanation: The text clearly states that the National Transportation Safety Board concluded the accident was due to improper controlling of the engines' serviceability, making this option a true statement.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...