Why the religious and political groups felt the academic core curriculum should not include novels?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "As it would lead to destruction of minds of students."
Explanation: The text states that certain religious and political groups believed that novel-reading 'occasions the destruction of the mind’s power.' This directly supports the idea that they felt novels could negatively impact students' minds, making this option correct.
Option 2: "As the students would start believing in such dramatis personae and start imitating them in less practical way."
Explanation: The text mentions that these groups felt novels made immoral characters interesting enough for young readers to identify with them. This implies that they believed students might imitate these characters in impractical ways, thus supporting this option as correct.
Option 3: "As they were lengthy and can divert students from core curriculum."
Explanation: While novels may be lengthy, the text does not mention length as a reason for excluding them from the curriculum. Instead, the focus is on the perceived negative influence of novels on students' minds and morals, making this option incorrect.
Option 4: "As they considered it as a wasteful thing for students in their future life."
Explanation: The text does not explicitly state that novels were considered wasteful. The criticism is more about the moral implications and influence of novels rather than their practical utility, which makes this option incorrect.
Option 5: "As they thought that students would not have interest in such things."
Explanation: The text does not indicate that the groups believed students would lack interest in novels. In fact, it suggests the opposite, that students might be drawn to the characters. Therefore, this option does not align with the text and is incorrect.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation