The project predicts that it can help reduce the country's pollution levels by 26% by the end of 2020. Moreover, it estimates that it can produce as much as 24,500 liters of biogas on a daily basis. This is far more than the test village needs, consuming only a paltry 91 liters per day to power up homes and offices. Compared to I-PG. biogas is a cheaper energy source with far less harmful effects on the environment. Moreover, the conversion of waste into fuel has significantly lessened the local's costs of living.
Which of the following are not beneficial effects of the biogas project?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "A source of methane which can power engine"
Explanation: The text mentions that the project uses methane gas to treat wastewater, but it does not indicate that this methane is used as a fuel source for engines, making this option not a beneficial effect of the project.
Option 1: "Fertilizer that can be used in rice paddies"
Explanation: The text states that the waste from the biogas project can be thrown in rice paddies as fertilizer, indicating that this is a beneficial effect of the project.
Option 3: "Fuel to power homes"
Explanation: The text clearly states that the biogas produced is used to power homes, which is a beneficial effect of the project.
Option 4: "Vast reduction in pollution levels"
Explanation: The project predicts a reduction in pollution levels by 26%, which is a significant beneficial effect of the biogas initiative.
Option 5: "Increased tofu production"
Explanation: The text does not mention any increase in tofu production as a result of the biogas project, making this option a non-beneficial effect.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation