What conclusions can be drawn from Dr. Erickson's study about how aye-ayes locate their prey?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "They may use a detection method not dependent on smell, sight, or sound."
Explanation: This option is supported by the text, which suggests that aye-ayes can locate their prey without relying on the traditional senses of smell, sight, or sound.
Option 1: "They rely on visual cues from the wood surface."
Explanation: The text states that the aye-ayes did not require visual clues of surface holes to locate their prey, indicating that they do not rely on visual cues.
Option 2: "They use their sense of smell to find insects."
Explanation: The study showed that aye-ayes could locate mealworms even when the smell was prevented from leaking out, which means they do not depend on their sense of smell.
Option 3: "They are dependent on the sounds made by the insects."
Explanation: The text mentions that aye-ayes also located dead mealworms, which were silent, indicating they do not rely on sounds made by the insects.
Option 5: "They use their elongated fingers to feel for the insects."
Explanation: The text describes how the aye-ayes use their elongated third finger to probe and scoop, indicating that they likely use this method to feel for insects.
Option 6: "They depend solely on the presence of insect activity."
Explanation: The text does not support this option, as it indicates that aye-ayes can locate prey without needing to see evidence of insect activity, such as surface holes.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation