The report is interesting because it shows how the wealth of a country is sometimes at odds with its level of happiness, and is often not an indicator of how the people are feeling, as measured by the UN's criteria. For example, China, where per-capita income has increased sharply over the last quarter of a century, still only ranked 79th on the list in 2017, up four places since the previous year. India, which has become a major economic power during the same time period as China, was much lower down the list at 122nd place in 2017. However, what is clear is that all of the countries at the top of the list, like Norway and Denmark, have a relatively high per-capita GDP compared to those in the lower reaches. Money may not be a clear indicator of happiness, but it is certainly a factor.
Which of the following statements does the writer make?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "The wealth of a nation isn't always a mark of how the population feels."
Explanation: This option is correct as it directly reflects the text's assertion that wealth does not necessarily correlate with happiness. The author states that the wealth of a country can be at odds with its happiness levels, as seen in the examples of China and India.
Option 1: "Countries in Scandinavia are better than the rest of the world."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not make a comparative statement about Scandinavia being better than other regions. It mentions that countries like Norway and Denmark rank high in happiness but does not imply superiority over the rest of the world.
Option 3: "India has followed a similar economic trajectory to China."
Explanation: This option is correct because the text indicates that both India and China have experienced significant economic growth over the same time period. However, despite this growth, their happiness rankings differ, which supports the idea of a similar trajectory.
Option 4: "Some of the more successful nations in the world believe in low taxation."
Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not discuss taxation policies of successful nations. It focuses on happiness rankings and economic indicators without mentioning taxation.
Option 5: "It's important for immigration to be kept low if a country is to achieve a high GDP."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not address immigration or its impact on GDP. The focus is on happiness and economic status, not immigration policies.
Option 6: "The USA is a strong military power with a great deal of sway financially."
Explanation: This option is correct as it aligns with the text's mention of America's economic status and military power. The author implies that while the USA ranks high in these areas, it does not rank as high in happiness.
Option 7: "Asian countries are likely to feature lower on the happiness list."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because while the text mentions specific Asian countries like China and India ranking lower in happiness, it does not generalize that all Asian countries will have similar rankings. The statement lacks sufficient support from the text.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation