Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #4393 Indus Valley
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
During the Bronze Age, around 5000 years ago, a civilization thrived in the Indus Valley, spanning a region that includes parts of modern-day Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. Archaeologists consider it, along with two other contemporaneous cultures emerging in Mesopotamia and Egypt, to be among the most significant early urban settlements. Of the three enclaves, however, the Indus Valley community was the only one to successfully develop away from a permanent water source. Mesopotamian and Egyptian cultures relied upon an abundance of fresh river water for agriculture, migration and the transportation of goods. It had been a longstanding presumption among archaeologists that ancient settlers were attracted to an area because of its river. Why, then, was the largest concentration of Indus Valley settlement located a considerable distance from either the Indus or Ganges-Yamuna river systems?
A team of earth scientists has produced new research that may provide an answer. Using satellite imaging and examining geological strata in the region, the scientists have ascertained that there was once a powerful river flowing directly through the Indus Valley settlements but it diverted from this course thousands of years earlier. As it did so, the river marked the landscape with a `scar'—called a paleochannel—and deposited a fine-grain and fertile sediment that may have enticed the Bronze Age settlers several centuries later. The team suggests that the incised paleochannel was ideal for urban development because it offered an arable environment free from the threat of damage or crop loss caused by river flooding. It is likely, therefore, that it was the absence of the river, not its presence, which prompted these Indus Valley settlements.

Why were Indus Valley settlers drawn to a region without a river?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "The valley was situated in an ancient riverbed."

Explanation: The text states that there was once a powerful river flowing through the Indus Valley settlements, which indicates that the valley was indeed situated in an ancient riverbed. This is supported by the mention of a paleochannel, which is a remnant of the river's previous course, suggesting that the settlers were drawn to the fertile land left behind by the ancient river.

Option 2: "Its land was nonetheless suitable for farming."

Explanation: The text explains that the paleochannel deposited fine-grain and fertile sediment, making the land suitable for farming. This directly supports the idea that the settlers were attracted to the region due to its agricultural potential, despite the absence of a current river.

Option 3: "The paleochannel posed a natural barrier to invading cultures."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not mention the paleochannel serving as a barrier to invading cultures. Instead, it focuses on the benefits of the paleochannel for urban development and agriculture, not defense.

Option 4: "The landscape was unlike that of Egypt or Mesopotamia."

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not discuss the landscape's differences from Egypt or Mesopotamia. It emphasizes the unique agricultural advantages of the Indus Valley, rather than comparing it to other regions.

Option 5: "They were not interested in transporting goods by water."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not indicate that the settlers were uninterested in transporting goods by water. In fact, it highlights that Mesopotamian and Egyptian cultures relied on rivers for transportation, implying that the absence of a river in the Indus Valley was a significant factor for the settlers.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...