Which of the following are NOT beneficial effects of the biogas project?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "It would not be safe to dump into water."
Explanation: The text implies that the waste produced can be safely dumped into waterways, which contradicts this statement. Therefore, this option is not a beneficial effect of the biogas project.
Option 1: "It helps reduce a country’s pollution levels."
Explanation: The text states that the project could bring down Indonesia's pollution levels by as much as 26%, indicating that this is indeed a beneficial effect of the biogas project.
Option 2: "It is a cheaper energy source."
Explanation: The text mentions that biogas is a cheap energy source compared to LPG, LNG, coal, and oil, confirming that this is a beneficial effect of the project.
Option 4: "It has no harmful effects."
Explanation: The text suggests that biogas has fewer harmful effects compared to other energy sources, indicating that this statement is not a beneficial effect of the project.
Option 5: "It can be sourced from waste."
Explanation: The text clearly states that the project converts wastewater into biogas, confirming that this is a beneficial effect of the biogas project.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation