All had small populations. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Denmark and Norway had fewer than 1 million people, while Sweden and the Netherlands had fewer than 2.5 million inhabitants. All exhibited moderate growth rates in the course of the century (Denmark the highest and Sweden the lowest), but all more than doubled in population by 1900. Density varied greatly. The Netherlands had one of the highest population densities in Europe, whereas Norway and Sweden had the lowest. Denmark was in between but closer to the Netherlands.
Considering human capital as a characteristic of the population, however, all four countries were advantaged by the large percentages of their populations who could read and write. In both 1850 and 1914, the Scandinavian countries had the highest literacy rates in Europe, or in the world, and the Netherlands was well above the European average.
This fact was of enormous value in helping the national economies find their niches in the evolving currents of the international economy. Location was an important factor for all four countries. All had immediate access to the sea, and this had important implications for a significant international resource, fish, as well as for cheap transport, merchant marines, and the shipbuilding industry. Each took advantage of these opportunities in its own way. The people of the Netherlands, with a long tradition of fisheries and mercantile shipping, had difficulty in developing good harbors suitable for steamships; eventually they did so at Rotterdam and Amsterdam, with exceptional results for transit trade with Germany and central Europe and for the processing of overseas foodstuffs and raw materials (sugar, tobacco, chocolate, grain, and eventually oil). Denmark also had an admirable commercial history, particularly with respect to traffic through the Sound (the strait separating Denmark and Sweden). In 1857, in return for a payment of 63 million kronor from other commercial nations, Denmark abolished the Sound toll dues, the fees it had collected since 1497 for the use of the Sound. This, along with other policy shifts toward free trade, resulted in a significant increase in traffic through the Sound and in the port of Copenhagen.
The political institutions of the four countries posed no significant barriers to industrialization or economic growth. The nineteenth century passed relatively peacefully for these countries, with progressive democratization taking place in all of them. They were reason[1]ably well governed, without notable corruption or grandiose state projects, although in all of them the government gave some aid to railways, and in Sweden the state built the main lines. As small countries dependent on foreign markets, they had few or low barriers to foreign trade in the main, though a protectionist movement developed in Sweden. In Denmark and Sweden agricultural reforms took place gradually from the late eighteenth century through the first half of the nineteenth, resulting in a new class of peasant landowners with a definite market orientation.
The key factor in the success of these countries (along with high literacy, which contributed to it, was their ability to adapt to the international division of labor determined by the early industrializers and to stake out areas of specialization in international markets for which they were especially well suited. This meant a great dependence on international commerce, which had notorious fluctuations; however, it also meant high returns to those aspects of production that were fortunate enough to be well placed in times of prosperity. In Sweden exports accounted for 18 percent of the national income in 1870, and in 1913, 22 percent of a much larger national income. In the early twentieth century, Denmark exported 63 percent of its agricultural production: butter, pork products, and eggs. It exported 80 percent of its butter, almost all to Great Britain, where it accounted for 40 percent of British butter imports.
Select answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage.
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "Thanks to their ready access to the sea, these countries enjoyed advantages in mercantile shipping, fishing, and shipbuilding."
Explanation: This option is correct as it directly reflects the text's assertion that all four countries had immediate access to the sea, which provided significant advantages in fishing, merchant shipping, and shipbuilding. The text states that this access had important implications for their economies, supporting the idea that their geographical location was a key factor in their industrial success.
Option 1: "Although these countries all started with small, uneducated populations, industrialization led to significant population growth and higher literacy rates."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text states that these countries had small populations but does not describe them as uneducated at the start. In fact, it highlights that they had high literacy rates, especially in the Scandinavian countries, which contradicts the claim of being uneducated. The passage emphasizes that their literacy rates were advantageous for their industrial success, not that they started uneducated.
Option 3: "Because they all had good harbors for steamships, these countries started with an important advantage in the competition for transit trade."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text indicates that the Netherlands had difficulty developing good harbors suitable for steamships initially. While they eventually succeeded in creating such harbors, the statement implies an advantage that was not present at the start, which contradicts the information provided in the passage.
Option 4: "These countries were successful primarily because their high literacy rates helped them fill specialized market niches."
Explanation: This option is correct as it aligns with the text's assertion that high literacy rates were a significant factor in the countries' ability to adapt to the international division of labor and find their niches in the market. The passage emphasizes that literacy contributed to their economic success, making this option a valid representation of the main ideas.
Option 5: "Because they were never fully dependent on international commerce, these countries were able to survive notorious fluctuations in international markets."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text clearly states that these countries had a great dependence on international commerce, which is contrary to the claim made in this option. The passage discusses how their success was tied to international trade, including the fluctuations that came with it, making this statement misleading.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation