It must be admitted that no psychologist is willing to stop with the known and proved, but, when he has presented that, dips into the fascinations of the yet unknown, and works with promising theory, which tomorrow may prove to be science also.
What aspects of the mind have been stated about which we don't have proven facts?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "That comes under the realm of metaphysics"
Explanation: The text clearly states that when psychology departs from facts that can be proved, it becomes metaphysics. This indicates that aspects of the mind that are not proven fall into the realm of metaphysics, which is beyond science.
Option 2: "Some chemical facts demonstrated in the chemical laboratory"
Explanation: This option is incorrect because it refers to proven facts in chemistry, not aspects of the mind lacking proven facts. The text contrasts psychology with established sciences like chemistry, emphasizing that the latter has confirmed facts.
Option 3: "That may one day come under the realm of science"
Explanation: The text mentions that psychologists explore theories that may eventually be proven as science. This aligns with the idea that there are aspects of the mind currently unproven but potentially valid in the future.
Option 4: "That is departed from science"
Explanation: The text states that when psychology moves away from proven facts, it departs from science. This supports the idea that unproven aspects of the mind are not within the scientific domain.
Option 5: "Guesses or theories that have passed through tests"
Explanation: This option is incorrect because it suggests that guesses or theories have been tested, which contradicts the text's assertion that psychology is no longer about guesses or theories but about confirmed facts.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation