Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #5593 Nature 2
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
After Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of America in 2005, researchers questioned individuals who were able to leave the city but chose to stay. Around 18 percent said they stayed because they did not want to leave family members but nearly 50 percent of them would not leave their dogs and cats. 1,400 people died that day; some of them surely died because they loved their pets too much.
Evolutionary psychologists argue that caring is a technique present from birth, designed to keep us alive by helping relatives or others who will someday help us. Why, then, should we invest time, money and love in animals, who are unlikely to ever return the favour?
I believe our love for pets comes from three features of human nature: natural instincts, culture and empathy. The human brain makes us feel warm and happy when we see baby cheeks and big eyes. This developed to persuade us to take care of our own young. But it makes kittens and puppies seem attractive too. It also explains why we feel strongly about an animal such as a baby seal, yet care so little about one like the much rarer - but rather ugly - Chinese salamander.
But if this theory is true, we would expect that pet-keeping would, like music, be found in all human societies. This is not the case. In the Kenyan village where anthropologist Nyaga Mwaniki was born, people use dogs to guard against strangers and chase away wild animals. The dogs, however, are never touched or allowed to sleep in a human's bed. Indeed, Nyaga's native language does not even contain a word for 'pet'.

According to the text, which of the following statements is true about the human connection with pets?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Evidence suggests that people were prepared to die in Hurricane Katrina to save their pets."

Explanation: The text states that around 50 percent of individuals who stayed during Hurricane Katrina did so because they would not leave their pets, and it mentions that some people died because they loved their pets too much. This directly supports the idea that people were willing to risk their lives for their pets.

Option 2: "Different parts of the brain recognise the need to care for different species."

Explanation: The text does not mention different parts of the brain recognizing the need to care for different species. Instead, it discusses a general human instinct to care for beings that evoke a nurturing response, without specifying different brain functions for different species.

Option 3: "Humans are born with natural caring behaviours."

Explanation: The text refers to evolutionary psychologists who argue that caring is a technique present from birth, suggesting that humans have innate caring behaviors. This aligns with the idea that humans are born with natural instincts to care for others.

Option 4: "The decision to care for animals offers some benefits to humans."

Explanation: While the text discusses the emotional responses humans have towards pets, it does not explicitly state that caring for animals offers benefits to humans. Therefore, this statement is not supported by the text.

Option 5: "Animals have never shown kindness to humans in return."

Explanation: The text implies that while humans care for pets, it questions the reciprocity of this care, suggesting that animals are unlikely to return the favor. This supports the idea that animals have not shown kindness to humans in return.

Option 6: "People have a stronger emotional response to some animals more than others."

Explanation: Although the text mentions that humans feel more strongly about certain animals, such as baby seals compared to the Chinese salamander, it does not explicitly state that this emotional response varies by species in a way that supports this option.

Option 7: "The need to treat animals as pets is a universal one."

Explanation: The text clearly states that pet-keeping is not found in all human societies, using the example of a Kenyan village where dogs are not treated as pets. This contradicts the idea that the need to treat animals as pets is universal.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...