Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #5606 Jungle 2
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
To find it, you have to go digging in rainforests, and to the untrained eye, it does not seem special at all - just a thick layer of dark earth that would not look out of place in many gardens. But these fertile, dark soils are in fact very special, because despite the lushness of tropical rainforests, the soils beneath them are usually very poor and thin. Even more surprising is where this dark soil comes from.
'You might expect this precious fertile resource to be found in the deep jungle, far from human settlements or farmers,' says James Fraser, who has been hunting for it in Africa's rainforests, 'But I go looking for dark earth round the edge of villages and ancient towns, and in traditionally farmed areas. It's usually there. And the older and larger the settlement, the more dark earth there is.'
Such findings are overturning some long-held ideas. Jungle farmers are usually blamed not just for cutting down trees but also for exhausting the soils. And yet the discovery of these rich soils - first in South America and now in Africa, too - suggest that, whether by chance or design, many people living in rainforests farmed in a way that enhanced rather than destroyed soils. In fact, it is becoming clear that part of what we think of as lush pure rainforest is actually long-abandoned farmland, enriched by the waste created by ancient humans.

What is significant about the 'dark soil' that the writer is referring to?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "It has resulted from agricultural activity."

Explanation: This option is correct because the text implies that the dark soil is a result of agricultural practices, particularly highlighting how ancient humans may have enhanced the soil through their farming methods.

Option 1: "It indicates the presence of good soil below it."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text states that the soils beneath tropical rainforests are usually very poor and thin, contradicting the idea that dark soil indicates good soil below it.

Option 2: "It is not present in rainforests."

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text discusses the presence of dark soil in rainforests, specifically mentioning its discovery in areas around villages and ancient towns within these ecosystems.

Option 4: "It is more common in South America than Africa."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not provide a comparison of the prevalence of dark soil between South America and Africa, only mentioning its discovery in both regions.

Option 5: "It is being found near where humans have lived."

Explanation: This option is correct as the text explicitly states that dark earth is found around the edges of villages and ancient towns, indicating its association with human habitation.

Option 6: "It has confirmed what people have believed for a long time."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text suggests that the findings are overturning long-held ideas rather than confirming them, indicating a shift in understanding.

Option 7: "It is less productive than people once thought."

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text highlights that the dark soil is actually a rich resource, suggesting it is more productive than previously believed.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...