Alternatively, we can study the curriculum in action, as it were. This second perspective takes us into the classroom itself. Here, we can observe the teaching/learning process and study the ways in which the intentions of the curriculum planners, which were developed during the planning phase, are put into action.
Yet another perspective relates to assessment and evaluation. From this perspective we would try and find out what students had learned and what they had failed to learn, in relation to what had been planned. In addition we might want to find out if they had learned anything which had not been planned.
Which of these ways of looking at an institution's curriculum is outlined in the text?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "observing what happens during lessons"
Explanation: The text explicitly mentions studying the curriculum in action, which involves observing the teaching/learning process in the classroom. This aligns directly with the option of observing what happens during lessons.
Option 2: "evaluating the materials used"
Explanation: While the text discusses selecting and adapting materials, it does not specifically mention evaluating them. Therefore, this option does not accurately reflect the content of the text.
Option 3: "analysing the content of tests"
Explanation: The text does not address the analysis of test content. It focuses on broader aspects of curriculum evaluation and learning outcomes, making this option irrelevant.
Option 4: "considering what is taken into account when preparing the curriculum"
Explanation: The text discusses curriculum planning, which includes decision-making related to identifying learners' needs, establishing goals, and selecting content. This directly supports the option of considering what is taken into account when preparing the curriculum.
Option 5: "comparing this curriculum with other choices that could have been made"
Explanation: The text does not mention comparing the curriculum with other choices. It focuses on the perspectives of planning, action, and evaluation, making this option not applicable.
Option 6: "reviewing actual learning compared to curriculum goals"
Explanation: The text refers to assessment and evaluation, which involves determining what students have learned in relation to what was planned. This aligns perfectly with the option of reviewing actual learning compared to curriculum goals.
Option 7: "assessing the effectiveness of teacher preparation for lessons"
Explanation: The text does not discuss the effectiveness of teacher preparation. It focuses on curriculum perspectives rather than teacher-specific evaluations, rendering this option incorrect.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation