Which of the following statements is/are not true in accordance with the information given in the above passage?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "Discovery of wheat helped shape primitive societies."
Explanation: The text clearly indicates that the discovery of wheat contributed to the development of Homo-sapiens from hunters to farmers, which directly supports the idea that it helped shape primitive societies.
Option 1: "Extracting fine pollen from raw wheat used to be an expensive process."
Explanation: The text states that the process of crushing grain and sifting flour was expensive, but it does not specifically mention that extracting fine pollen was expensive. Therefore, this statement is misleading and not entirely accurate.
Option 3: "Crushing wheat with the help of saddle shaped stones used to be a difficult task for ancient men."
Explanation: While the text mentions that Neolithic women experienced damage to their toes, knees, and vertebrae from kneeling to crush grains, it does not explicitly state that this task was difficult for ancient men. Thus, this statement is not supported by the text.
Option 4: "In ancient Rome milling was done with the help of slaves."
Explanation: The text states that the Romans used animals or slaves to drive the wheels to grind wheat, confirming that milling was indeed done with the help of slaves.
Option 5: "Baked wheat flour is tastier than porridge."
Explanation: The text mentions that baked flour was more enjoyable and tasty compared to raw wheat, but it does not make a direct comparison between baked wheat flour and porridge. Therefore, this statement is not supported by the text.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation