Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Re-order Paragraphs ID: #50706 Justifiable Violence
Instructions ›
The text boxes in the left panel have been placed in a random order. Restore the original order by dragging the text boxes from the left panel to the right panel.
* Move & order all paragraphs in the right field

Paragraph list

However, to mobbing (a form of verbal violence), you are not justified in replying with a punch (a form of physical violence).
Thus, to the punch you may be legitimate to respond with a punch.
The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence.
For example, if a person punches you in the face and seems intentions to keep doing so, it may seem justified to try and respond to the physical violence.

Your order

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

First sentence: Why this is the first line? This paragraph is the first sentence because it introduces the main idea about violence. It is a general statement that does not need other sentences for context. It does not use any pronouns or definite articles that refer to previous ideas. Why other lines are not chosen? Paragraph 2 starts with 'For example,' which is a conjunction. Paragraph 3 starts with 'Thus,' which is also a conjunction. Paragraph 4 starts with 'However,' which is another conjunction. All these sentences cannot stand alone as the first sentence.

Concluding sentence: Why this is the last line? This paragraph concludes the discussion about violence. It uses 'However' to show a final point. It wraps up the ideas by stating that responding to verbal violence is not justified.

Paragraph pairs:

  • Pair 1 (Paragraph 1 → Paragraph 2): Paragraph 2 gives an example of the idea in Paragraph 1. This is a 'Topic Example' strategy because it shows a specific case that supports the general idea of justification of violence.
  • Pair 2 (Paragraph 2 → Paragraph 3): Paragraph 3 continues the idea from Paragraph 2. It uses 'Thus' to show a logical connection. This is a 'Connector Strategy' because it links the example to a broader statement about responding to violence.
  • Pair 3 (Paragraph 3 → Paragraph 4): Paragraph 4 contrasts with Paragraph 3. It uses 'However' to show a different idea about violence. This is a 'Contrast' strategy because it presents a different view on responding to verbal violence.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...