Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Select Missing Word ID: #30188 Short Microscope 2
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording about a topic. At the end of the recording the last word or group of words has been replaced by a beep. Select the correct option to complete the recording.
When you first examine something under a microscope, say a leaf from a plant, you're amazed at how much detail there is and it's detail that you simply cannot see without magnification. And what you can see with the naked eye becomes suddenly huge under the lens. How big everything looks is astonishing but it's also amazingly intricate. Suddenly it's as if another world has opened up in front of your eyes and you think, hey, I hadn't realized that something so small, so tiny, could be so -
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "complex"

Explanation: The text describes the intricate details observed under a microscope, emphasizing the amazement at the complexity of what is seen. The word 'complex' aligns perfectly with the context of discovering intricate details that are not visible to the naked eye, supporting the idea that the small object (the leaf) has a rich and detailed structure.

Option 2: "unreal"

Explanation: While 'unreal' suggests something that is not real or is fantastical, it does not fit the context of the text, which focuses on the detailed and intricate nature of the object observed. The text does not imply that the details are imaginary or not real, thus making this option incorrect.

Option 3: "confusing"

Explanation: The term 'confusing' implies a lack of clarity or understanding, which contradicts the text's theme of amazement and discovery. The speaker is not confused by the details; rather, they are fascinated by the complexity, making this option unsuitable.

Option 4: "invisible"

Explanation: Although the text mentions that the details cannot be seen without magnification, 'invisible' does not capture the essence of the discovery. The focus is on the complexity revealed through magnification, not on the idea of invisibility. Therefore, this option does not accurately reflect the context.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...