Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Select Missing Word ID: #4230 Short Rabbits
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording. At the end of the recording the last word or group of words has been replaced by a beep. Select the correct option to complete the recording.
Rabbits are also associated with luck: Disney’s Oswald is a ‘lucky’ rabbit, Br’er Rabbit proves himself a lucky escape artist (as, of course, does Peter), and the ‘lucky’ rabbit’s foot’ is a tradition that exists in many cultures (although not so lucky for the rabbit in question of course). The humanized bunnie is also part of a much wider tradition of anthropomorphic children stories. Many of which assume the point of view of an animal. The animal autobiography has a long history, made most famous by Anna Sewell in her 1877 Black Beauty, but including earlier texts such as Francis Coventry’s The History of Pompey the Little (1751) or Dorothy Kilner’s The Life and Perambulations of a Mouse (from 1783). There is something irresistible about the notion that certain humans are able to talk to animals in their own language, but it is also a practice in everyday communication with pets and young children. We ‘converse’ with babies and pets, assuming both sides of the conversation and - translating the actions of the child, dog or cat into a response.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "translating the actions of the child, dog or cat into a response"

Explanation: This option directly reflects the text's content, which states we 'translate the actions of the child, dog or cat into a response.' This aligns perfectly with the main idea of communication with pets and children.

Option 1: "foreseeing what the child, dog or cat will think"

Explanation: This option suggests predicting thoughts, which is not supported by the text. The text focuses on translating actions into responses, not foreseeing thoughts.

Option 3: "enabling the child, dog or cat for appropriate response"

Explanation: This option implies enabling others to respond, which is not mentioned in the text. The focus is on our actions in response to theirs, not enabling their responses.

Option 4: "improving our ability to properly talk with child, dog or cat in their own language"

Explanation: While this option discusses talking in their language, it does not capture the essence of translating actions into responses as stated in the text. It suggests a broader improvement rather than the specific act of translation.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...