Transcript:
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "upped their odds of survival some 30 percent"
Explanation: The text states that sick ants preferred the peroxide diet, which "upped their odds of survival some 30 percent." This directly supports the idea that consuming the radical-rich food improved their chances of surviving the infection, aligning with the main idea of the text that discusses how certain foods can act as medicine for ants.
Option 2: "harmed their odds of survival"
Explanation: This option contradicts the information in the text. The text clearly indicates that the peroxide diet improved the ants' survival odds, not harmed them. Therefore, this option is not supported by the text.
Option 3: "boosted their fight against rivals"
Explanation: While this option suggests an improvement, it misinterprets the context. The text focuses on survival against a pathogenic fungus, not competition with rivals. Thus, this option does not relate to the main idea of the text.
Option 4: "exposed them to fungus"
Explanation: This option is incorrect as it implies a negative consequence rather than a beneficial effect. The text discusses how ants reacted to the fungus and how they used certain foods to combat it, rather than being exposed to it as a positive outcome.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation