Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Select Missing Word ID: #46380 Short Spaghetti
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording about a topic. At the end of the recording the last word or group of words has been replaced by a beep. Select the correct option to complete the recording.

Transcript:

So we now have a prevalence of something around 3/4 or 2/3 of the Australian adult population are approaching overweight or obesity. 1/4 of our children, the cost to society economically and socially, are extraordinarily high, but we're nonetheless healthier than we've been. In the history of mankind. And longer lived. So there has been. An upside to that, So what we've essentially done, as I say has. To mesh and trapped ourselves within it, and this is the so-called foresight Map, which came from the UK and what it does is it shows where you see it right at the middle of this tangled spaghetti
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "map of influences"

Explanation: The phrase 'map of influences' aligns perfectly with the context of the text, which discusses the 'foresight Map' that illustrates various factors related to obesity and health in Australia. This option captures the essence of the text, indicating a visual representation of interconnected influences on health outcomes.

Option 2: "gate of mirror"

Explanation: The phrase 'gate of mirror' does not relate to the content of the text. It introduces an unrelated concept that does not connect with the discussion of health influences. There is no mention of mirrors or gates in the context provided, making this option irrelevant.

Option 3: "history of error"

Explanation: The phrase 'history of error' suggests a focus on mistakes or failures, which is not the theme of the text. The text emphasizes health trends and societal costs rather than errors in history. Therefore, this option does not fit the context.

Option 4: "couple of superiors"

Explanation: The phrase 'couple of superiors' is unrelated to the main idea of the text. It implies a hierarchical relationship that is not discussed in the context of health and obesity. This option lacks relevance and does not connect with the themes presented.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...