Transcript:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "over 4,000 years ago."
Explanation: The text clearly states that the pyramids are more than four thousand years old, which directly supports this option. This aligns with the historical context provided in the text, confirming the accuracy of the statement.
Option 1: "over a 300-year period."
Explanation: The text states that the pyramids were built over a long period of time, specifically mentioning the peak period from roughly 2600 BCE to about 2320 BCE. This indicates a span of approximately 280 years, not 300 years. Therefore, this option misrepresents the time frame.
Option 2: "in the fourth century BCE."
Explanation: The text does not mention the fourth century BCE at all. Instead, it specifies the construction period as being from roughly 2600 BCE to about 2320 BCE, which is much earlier than the fourth century BCE. Thus, this option is factually incorrect.
Option 3: "to a height of over 150 metres."
Explanation: While the text mentions that the Great Pyramid of Giza is nearly 150 metres high, it does not state that the pyramids were built 'to' this height. The phrasing implies a goal or intention that is not supported by the text, making this option misleading.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation