Transcript:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "To show that a clients past behavior assists in diagnosis"
Explanation: The text states that in a diagnostic interview, the psychologist takes the client's case history to learn how the client has interacted with significant people in their life and how they have handled difficult situations. This information is crucial for understanding the client's behavior patterns, which directly assists in the diagnosis process. The main idea here is that past behavior provides insights into current issues, aligning perfectly with the purpose of taking a case history.
Option 2: "To compare the case histories of various clients"
Explanation: This option suggests a comparison between different clients' case histories, which is not mentioned in the text. The focus is solely on the individual client's history and how it relates to their diagnosis, making this option irrelevant. It implies a broader analysis that the text does not support.
Option 3: "To explain why some clients lie and some tell the truth"
Explanation: The text does not address the issue of clients lying or telling the truth during interviews. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of understanding the client's past behavior and experiences. This option introduces a concept that is not discussed in the text, making it incorrect.
Option 4: "To entertain the students with stories of unusual clients"
Explanation: This option implies that the purpose of discussing case histories is for entertainment, which contradicts the serious nature of psychological diagnosis outlined in the text. The focus is on gathering relevant information for diagnosis, not on entertaining students, thus making this option incorrect.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation