Transcript:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "it is now regarded as a measurable phenomenon, which can be addressed through government policies."
Explanation: This option accurately reflects the text's assertion that fear of crime is now seen as a quantifiable and measurable social scientific object, which can be targeted by policies. This aligns with the text's emphasis on the concept's transformation into a political issue that can be addressed through governmental action.
Option 1: "before the 1960s it referred to personal issues whereas now it refers to abstract issues, it was previously conceived in physical terms, whereas it is now seen in psychological terms."
Explanation: This option incorrectly suggests a shift from personal to abstract issues and from physical to psychological terms. The text does not support this distinction; instead, it emphasizes that fear of crime has evolved into a measurable social scientific object, rather than merely changing its focus from personal to abstract.
Option 2: "before the 1960s it was linked to victimization without being linked to more commonly held views about violence."
Explanation: This option implies a lack of connection to broader views on violence before the 1960s. However, the text does not mention this aspect, focusing instead on the evolution of the term into a measurable phenomenon and its significance as a political issue.
Option 4: "it is now regarded as a measurable phenomenon, which cannot be addressed through government policies."
Explanation: This option contradicts the text, which states that fear of crime is a policy target. The assertion that it cannot be addressed through government policies is incorrect, as the text highlights the concept's evolution into a measurable issue that is indeed subject to policy intervention.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation