Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #34090 Short Forensic experts
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.

Transcript:

Crime has a lot to do with the psychology of a person. Forensic psychology, for example, studies the general principles regarding the specific content and witness testimonials that are used in court to interact appropriately with legal professionals. A forensic psychologist even evaluates civil litigants to determine whether or not they have the capacity to participate in court. Thus, forensic psychology gets involved with all types of court cases, not only criminal ones. A forensic expert, for instance, may be asked to present himself in court as the witness for a civil matter. In this case, the cross-questioning may hamper the ability of the court to make a decision, hence, a lot of credibility is required while testifying. A forensic psychologist is a strong-minded professional and his mind is sufficiently trained in social, clinical and organizational psychology.

Which of the following statements most accurately summarizes the opinion of the author in the text?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "A forensic psychologist is a type of legal expert that can solve issues involving a case even before the defendant or the plaintiff have been properly represented."

Explanation: The text emphasizes the role of forensic psychologists in evaluating litigants and providing insights that can influence court decisions, indicating their expertise in addressing legal issues. This aligns with the author's opinion that forensic psychologists play a crucial role in the legal process, supporting the idea that they can address issues before formal representation occurs.

Option 2: "A forensic expert's opinion may help a lawyer win a case even if the crime is committed by someone else."

Explanation: This option suggests that a forensic expert's opinion can influence a case unrelated to the crime committed, which is not supported by the text. The text focuses on the role of forensic psychologists in evaluating cases and providing testimony relevant to the specific litigants involved, making this statement misleading.

Option 3: "Forensic experts not only need to study theory, since research work and practical experience matter more."

Explanation: While the text mentions the training of forensic psychologists in various psychological fields, it does not specifically state that practical experience is more important than theoretical knowledge. This option misrepresents the author's focus on the comprehensive role of forensic psychologists in the legal system.

Option 4: "Any lawyer fighting a criminal litigation needs a forensic expert, or he might lose the case."

Explanation: This statement implies that a forensic expert is essential for every criminal case, which is an overgeneralization not supported by the text. The author discusses the involvement of forensic psychologists in various types of cases, not exclusively criminal ones, indicating that their necessity can vary depending on the case.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...