Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #34092 Short Aristotle.
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.

Transcript:

If our language acts as a pair of glasses with tinted lenses, can we go one step further? Are these lenses actually distorting? Does our language predispose us to a particular line of thinking and warp our view of reality? Do the differences that exist between languages in their grammatical structure or in their vocabulary actually control our patterns of thought? As some linguists have asked: How different would Aristotle's logic have been if he had spoken Mandarin or Hopi?

What is the main issue which is concerning the writer?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "the extent to which language influences thought"

Explanation: This option is correct because the text explicitly discusses the influence of language on thought processes. The writer questions whether language distorts our view of reality and how grammatical structures and vocabulary can shape our thinking patterns, making this the central issue of the text.

Option 1: "the reasons behind Aristotle's philosophy"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not focus on Aristotle's philosophy itself or the reasons behind it. Instead, it raises questions about how language might influence thought, using Aristotle as an example rather than discussing his philosophical ideas directly.

Option 2: "the way in which writers distort reality"

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not specifically address writers or their role in distorting reality. The focus is on how language itself may distort our perception of reality, rather than the actions of writers.

Option 4: "the causes of differences between languages"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because while the text mentions differences between languages, it does not delve into the causes of these differences. Instead, it focuses on the implications of these differences for thought and perception, which is not the same as exploring their origins.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...