Transcript:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Telecom operators cannot provide discriminatory prices for their clients."
Explanation: The text clearly states that net neutrality ensures non-discriminatory net availability without differential tariffs. This means that telecom operators are not allowed to charge different prices based on the type of data or the client, supporting the idea that they cannot provide discriminatory prices.
Option 2: "Telecom operators can apply discriminatory prices for their clients."
Explanation: This option contradicts the main idea of the text, which emphasizes that net neutrality prohibits discrimination in pricing. The text explicitly states that under net neutrality, all enterprises should have equal access without differential tariffs.
Option 3: "Telecom operators can provide differential prices for different category of clients."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because it suggests that telecom operators can charge different prices based on client categories, which goes against the principle of net neutrality outlined in the text. The text asserts that net neutrality ensures a level playing field without differential pricing.
Option 4: "Based on client need telecom operators can provide discriminatory prices."
Explanation: This option implies that telecom operators can set prices based on client needs, which is not supported by the text. The text clearly states that net neutrality prohibits any form of discrimination, including pricing based on client needs.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation