Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #37986 Medium Quebecor
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
At the time, there was a cause of disagreement between somatic-chemic families who had built permanent camps on their ancestral land, and the local town council over municipal taxes for resort leases. The town council wanted this that he can make family to pay annual taxes, just like the few Quebecor families who add cottages along the river. The etic hemic argued that based on the families’ historical and customary affiliation with that particular territory, they should be treated differently from the vacationers. With the help of an atomic research assistant and interpreter, our task was to demonstrate the ancestral and historical presence of the atomic families in the area. We produce genealogical charter family histories, much of hunting territories. After our report was completed, the town council agreed to the amount of the ethic-hemic, no taxes on their permanent camps have since been requested for the antigenic nation, it was a small yet significant victory within the broader political agenda of achieving recognition of their land rights and ancestral title. For may ask for them, this short-term contract was the starting point of a long-term relationship of trust and further collaborative researches.

What was the main cause of disagreement between the somatic-chemic families and the local town council?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "The town council wanted the families to pay annual taxes on their resort leases."

Explanation: This option is correct as the text explicitly states that the town council wanted the somatic-chemic families to pay annual taxes, similar to the Quebecor families with cottages. This reflects the main cause of disagreement.

Option 1: "The town council wanted the families to vacate their ancestral land."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not mention any desire from the town council for the families to vacate their land. Instead, the disagreement centers around the issue of taxes, not land vacating.

Option 3: "The town council wanted to demolish the families' cottages along the river."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not indicate any intention from the town council to demolish cottages. The focus is on tax payments, not on demolishing properties.

Option 4: "The town council wanted the families to abandon their hunting territories."

Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not mention any request for the families to abandon their hunting territories. The disagreement is specifically about tax obligations, not territorial abandonment.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...