Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #4152 Short Microbes
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Three years ago, genome pioneer Craig Venter sailed the Sargasso sea and returned with 1800 species of microbes, including 150 never before seen. An impressive haul. But last week, scientists in New York announced that if you want to discover new and interesting bugs, you need travel no further than your own forearm. The researchers, at the NYU School of Medicine, identified 182 species of bacteria, including a dozen new ones, in swabs taken from the arms of six healthy volunteers. Their study marks the first full-scale expedition to catalog the biota that calls the human epidermis its home. The microbes that live in and on our bodies out number our own cells 10 to 1. So they’re an important part of our personal ecology. And it turns out the zoo of bacteria on one person’s skin is very different from the zoo on someone else’s. Almost three-quarters of the species identified were unique to an individual. And only four species were found on all six subjects. For the record, the researchers took their samples from the subjects’ forearms because that way no one had to undress. So who knows what exotic life forms may be waiting for discovery just behind your knees.

What is the speaker's reason for preferring samples from forearms?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "It did not required removing clothes"

Explanation: The text states that the researchers took their samples from the subjects’ forearms because that way no one had to undress. This directly supports the answer, as it highlights the convenience and comfort of the method chosen.

Option 2: "It really was the easiest method"

Explanation: While the method may have been easy, the text does not explicitly state that it was the easiest method. This option lacks direct support from the text and is too vague.

Option 3: "It was not at all time consuming"

Explanation: The text does not mention anything about the time consumption of the sampling process. Therefore, this option introduces information that is not present in the text.

Option 4: "Forearms have more number of cells"

Explanation: The text does not discuss the number of cells in the forearms or suggest that this was a reason for choosing that location. This option presents a fact that is not relevant to the context provided.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...