Climate scientists - Marvel EDU

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #45366 Short Climate scientists

Instructions ›

Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.

Transcript:

I think it's often completely mixed up. And I think that's understandable because if you think about the people who are communicating, let's take climate scientists just because I am one. We have been studying, you know, the changing climate, we've seen the changes. I'm a polar scientist, I've seen the changes and the scale of the changes, and it's horrifying and so it's very difficult not to get personally involved and to want certain outcomes from your communication. Trying to dissociate and step back from that and be as dispassionate as possible is challenging.

What challenge does the speaker identify when climate scientists communicate about climate change?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Climate scientists often exaggerate the impact of climate change to achieve their communication goals. It is difficult for climate scientists to remain dispassionate when communicating about the changes they have observed. Climate scientists are often not personally affected by the changes they study, making it hard to convey urgency. The primary challenge is the public’s misunderstanding of scientific data, not the scientists’ communication approach.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Option 2: "It is difficult for climate scientists to remain dispassionate when communicating about the changes they have observed."

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the speaker's main point. The speaker explicitly states that it is challenging for climate scientists to dissociate from their personal experiences and emotions regarding climate change, which aligns with the identified challenge in the question.

Option 1: "Climate scientists often exaggerate the impact of climate change to achieve their communication goals."

Explanation: This option suggests that climate scientists exaggerate, which contradicts the speaker's point about the difficulty of remaining dispassionate. The speaker does not imply that exaggeration is a common practice; rather, they highlight the challenge of personal involvement in communication.

Option 3: "Climate scientists are often not personally affected by the changes they study, making it hard to convey urgency."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the speaker's perspective. The speaker is a polar scientist who has personally observed the changes, indicating that they are indeed affected. Therefore, this option does not align with the speaker's experience or the challenge they describe.

Option 4: "The primary challenge is the public’s misunderstanding of scientific data, not the scientists’ communication approach."

Explanation: This option shifts the focus from the scientists' emotional challenges to the public's misunderstanding, which is not what the speaker discusses. The speaker emphasizes the difficulty of maintaining a dispassionate stance rather than addressing public comprehension.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.

Saving...