Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #4653 Short Sleep
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.

Transcript:

There is increasing evidence that a sleep after lunch, or siesta as the Spanish call it, can improve performance at work. Not only does it produce short-term benefits such as increased alertness and concentration in the late afternoon, but it has long-term effects like reducing the risk of heart problems and strokes. Research also highlights the dangers of sleeping for too long. Ideally, a midday nap should not exceed thirty minutes as anything longer can reduce your ability to think and function immediately after waking. It can also interfere with nighttime sleeping. The reason for this is that sleep cycles enter a deep phase after about thirty minutes.

What is the main point the speaker is making about sleeping in the afternoon?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "Having a nap during the day can have both positive and negative outcomes depending on the length of time the person remains asleep."

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the main point of the text. It acknowledges that short naps can enhance alertness and have long-term health benefits, while also recognizing that longer naps can lead to negative effects such as impaired reasoning and disrupted nighttime sleep. This balanced view aligns with the text's discussion of the benefits and drawbacks of midday sleep.

Option 1: "A midday sleep of any duration has both immediate and longer-lasting health benefits."

Explanation: This option incorrectly states that any duration of midday sleep is beneficial. The text specifies that while short naps can improve alertness and have long-term health benefits, naps exceeding thirty minutes can lead to negative effects, contradicting the claim that all durations are beneficial.

Option 2: "Going to sleep at midday for less than half an hour can have adverse effects on a person's health."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the text. The text indicates that naps shorter than thirty minutes can provide benefits, while naps longer than thirty minutes can have adverse effects. Therefore, this statement is inaccurate as it suggests that even short naps are harmful.

Option 3: "A midday sleep has been shown to cause a variety of problems such as influencing a person's ability to reason clearly."

Explanation: This option incorrectly implies that all midday sleep leads to problems. The text mentions that naps longer than thirty minutes can impair reasoning and functioning, but it does not state that midday sleep in general causes problems. Thus, this option misrepresents the overall message.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...