Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #4657 Medium Stratum
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Today we're looking at two kinds of strata—not the rocky kind, but the linguistic kind. A stratum, or 'layer', describes the influence one language has on the development of another in terms of its vocabulary, grammar, syntax, or other features. Historically, linguistic changes have come about largely due to migration, when one group brings its language into the territory where another language is already in use. When the migration is the result of war or takeover, the language of the conquering group is called a superstratum, whereas the preexisting language of the region is called the substratum. Although the name substratum and the subservient position of the conquered group imply a lower status, often its language is the one that endures. In France, for example, the original Gaulish language is a substratum because it was largely superseded by Latin after the Roman conquest. Later, though, the Germanic Franks conquered France—so their Frankish language is the superstratum—but they gradually adopted the Latin of their subjects.

What do the terms superstrata and substrata refer to?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "The effect one language has on the evolution of a second."

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the main idea of the text, which discusses how one language influences another, specifically through the concepts of superstratum and substratum. The text defines these terms in the context of linguistic layers, emphasizing the impact of one language on the development of another, particularly during migration and conquest.

Option 2: "The influence of war and trade on the development of languages."

Explanation: While the text mentions migration due to war, it does not discuss trade as a factor in the development of languages. Therefore, this option introduces information that is not present in the text, making it incorrect.

Option 3: "The differences between formal and informal speech contexts."

Explanation: This option is unrelated to the content of the text, which focuses on the influence of one language on another rather than on speech contexts. Thus, it does not align with the main idea presented.

Option 4: "The effects that learning a second language has on speakers."

Explanation: This option discusses the effects of learning a second language, which is not addressed in the text. The text focuses on the historical and linguistic implications of superstratum and substratum, making this option irrelevant.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...